Posts Tagged: President Obama

President Expands Use of Private Sector Auditors

President Obama signed a presidential memorandum on March 10 directing all federal departments and agencies to “expand and intensify their use of payment recapture audits under their current authority.” In other words, don’t wait for more legislation to get passed.  The memorandum also announced the President’s support for the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act, which is a new bipartisan legislation (hey, it could happen) before Congress intended to expand the ability of government agencies to fund future audits with recaptured payments. That would alleviate the need to go back to the well for more funding, assuming they are successful in “recapturing” revenue from improper payments, which is certainly not a bad idea and rather likely to happen, given the success of other such programs, such as the Recovery Audit Contractors programs.

New Term Used

The administration has chosen to use a new phrase, Payment Recapture Audits (PRA), to describe these new efforts. Nevertheless, the memorandum specifically defines PRAs as virtually identical to Recovery Audits, which have already been defined in previous OMB documents, specifically Appendix C to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-123.

PRAs are “investigations in which specialized private sector auditors use cutting-edge technology and tools to scrutinize government payments and then find and reclaim taxpayer funds made in error or gained through fraud.  These auditors can be compensated based on the amount of improper payments they identify and are reclaimed – providing a powerful incentive to find every error.”  That is, these new programs will be just like the RACs, and be what the AMA has already termed, “draconian, time-consuming, and devoid of efforts to improve the Medicare system.”

Going Beyond Fee-for-Service

In November 2009, the President issued Executive Order 1350, on Reducing Improper Payments.  The order focused on both reducing improper payments and eliminating waste in federal programs, said to total $98 billion in Fiscal Year 2009 alone. However, using reclaimed funds to pay for “recapture audits” was only possible for programs such as the Medicare Fee-for-Service program payments, but not for government contracts at the 20 out of 24 major government agencies doing more than $500 million in government contracting (including grants and other forms of federal benefit payments to state and local governments, colleges, universities, banks, and non-profit organizations). The memorandum now allows all those payments to be audited in this way.

How Many Programs Might We Expect to See?

We don’t need to tell you that there are lots of agencies and departments that regulate healthcare providers — and possibly therefore audit said providers. Have you ever counted them? We made an attempt, just sticking to the federal ones…

Here’s the list we came up with:

  1. U.S. Congress
  2. U.S. Supreme Court
  3. Federal Circuit Courts
  4. HHS/CMS
  5. OIG
  6. FDA
  7. OSHA
  8. CDC/NIOSH
  9. HHS/HRSA
  10. FCC
  11. FTC
  12. EPA
  13. IRS
  14. DEA
  15. FAA
  16. SEC
  17. Dept of Justice
  18. Dept of the Treasury
  19. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  20. Department of Labor
  21. Department of Transportation
  22. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  23. The Joint Commission
  24. Provider Reimbursement Review Board
  25. HHS Organ Procurement Organizations
  26. CMS Home Health Agency
  27. Medicare Integrity Program Contractors
  28. Recovery Audit Contractors
  29. DME Regional Contractors
  30. CMS Intermediaries
  31. CMS Carriers
  32. CMS MACs

… and we’re sure this is not an exhaustive list, even just for the Fed.

President Obama & Dr. Gawande

With all the activity lately on his desire “fix” health care nationwide, ever wonder what President Obama has been reading, of late? There were some recent articles about just that, and if you haven’t seen these articles, we highly recommend them:

This article from Dr. Atul Gawande of Harvard Medical School, published by The New Yorker on June 1 started it all: The Cost Conundrum, What a Texas town can teach us about health care

By June 8, President Obama had seen the article and it “dramatically affected his thinking” according to The New York Times: Health Care Spending Disparities Stir a Fight - includes coverage of his talks with Senators

June 9: Blogs began to notice: President Obama read Atul Gawande’s excellent piece on Healthcare

June 12: President Obama speaks at a town hall meeting in Green Bay, WI, citing McAllen’s costs and compares them to costs at Mayo Clinic: Text of Obama’s remarks and an article about this speech

June 13: an editorial appeared in The New York Times: Doctors and the Cost of Care

June 14: Gawande fans at Seton Hall University School of Law write about it on their weblog: Why McAllen Texas Kant be the answer to health reform

After you read any one of those, you’ll see that Dr. Gawande’s thinking, despite being a doctor himself, is squarely pointed at physicians. Reportedly, President Obama sees the logic in that, at least in some way.

Get All New Posts by eMail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

post categories

Clicky Web Analytics

Weblogs Directory

Powered by FeedBurner

 Subscribe in your own
Favorite RSS Reader

Pageviews in 2010 =